Honest Claude Code review after extensive testing. Features, pricing, real-world performance, and whether it's worth switching from Cursor or GitHub Copilot.
Claude Code Review 2025: Is It Worth the Hype?
Claude Code is everywhere right now. Developers on Twitter won't shut up about it. The subreddits are flooded with "I built X in 2 hours with Claude Code" posts.
Is it actually good? Or is this just another AI hype cycle?
After weeks of daily use across real projects—internal tools, client dashboards, complex refactors—here's my honest assessment.
The 30-Second Verdict
Claude Code is the most capable AI coding tool available. It's not the most convenient (terminal-only), not the cheapest ($20/month), and not the easiest to learn. But when you need AI that actually thinks through complex problems, nothing else comes close.
Best for: Complex refactoring, large codebases, architectural decisions, developers who live in the terminal.
Not for: Quick edits, casual coding, developers who hate the command line.
Rating: 9/10 for power users, 7/10 for general use.
What is Claude Code?
Claude Code is Anthropic's CLI tool for AI-assisted coding. Unlike Cursor or GitHub Copilot that integrate into IDEs, Claude Code runs in your terminal and works alongside any editor.
You give it a task. It reads your codebase, thinks through the problem, and executes changes across multiple files—explaining every step.
Think of it as having a senior developer pair-programming with you, except they can read your entire codebase instantly.
What Makes Claude Code Different
1. Agentic by Default
Most AI coding tools are reactive—you ask, they answer. Claude Code is agentic—you give it a goal, and it figures out how to achieve it.
Example prompt: "Add authentication to this Express app using Passport.js"
What Claude Code does:
- Analyzes your existing structure
- Creates auth middleware
- Sets up routes
- Modifies database models
- Updates environment config
- Creates login/register views
- Tests the implementation
It's not just writing code. It's shipping features.
2. Full Codebase Understanding
Claude Code has a 200K token context window (effectively unlimited for most projects). It reads your entire codebase and understands how everything connects.
This matters when:
- Refactoring affects multiple files
- You're working on unfamiliar code
- Changes need to follow existing patterns
- You need to understand dependencies
Other tools require you to manually tag files for context. Claude Code just... knows.
3. Deep Reasoning
Claude (the model) excels at complex reasoning. Claude Code inherits this. When you give it a hard problem, it thinks through multiple approaches before acting.
I've watched it:
- Identify potential bugs in my proposed solution
- Suggest better architectural patterns
- Catch edge cases I missed
- Explain why my approach wouldn't scale
This isn't autocomplete. It's genuine problem-solving.
4. Terminal-Native Workflow
Claude Code runs commands directly:
- npm install
- git operations
- Running tests
- Database migrations
- Deployment scripts
Everything stays in one place. No context-switching between IDE and terminal.
The Good: What Claude Code Does Well
Complex Refactoring
This is where Claude Code destroys the competition. I needed to migrate a codebase from class components to hooks. 47 files. Complex state management.
Claude Code:
- Analyzed the entire codebase
- Identified all class components
- Mapped state and lifecycle methods to hooks
- Migrated components one by one
- Updated tests
- Verified everything worked
Time: 3 hours (would have taken me 2-3 days).
Debugging Mysterious Issues
"The app crashes in production but works locally."
I pasted the error, pointed Claude Code at the codebase, and asked what's happening.
It found:
- A race condition in the initialization
- An environment variable missing in production
- A subtle difference in how dates were parsed
Fixed in 20 minutes. I'd been debugging for hours.
Learning New Codebases
Joining a new project? Clone the repo, run Claude Code, and ask questions:
- "How does authentication work in this app?"
- "Where is the payment processing logic?"
- "What's the data flow from API to database?"
It's like having documentation that actually answers your questions.
Writing Tests
"Write comprehensive tests for the user service."
Claude Code reads the service, understands the business logic, and writes tests that actually cover the edge cases—not just happy-path nonsense.
The Bad: Claude Code's Limitations
Terminal-Only Interface
No inline completions. No syntax highlighting in the chat. No pretty IDE integration.
If you want AI suggestions as you type, Claude Code isn't for you. It's designed for bigger tasks, not keystroke-level assistance.
Workaround: Use Claude Code for complex tasks, Cursor/Copilot for quick edits.
Learning Curve
You need to know:
- Basic terminal navigation
- How to frame good prompts
- When to give more context
- How to review AI-generated changes
It's not hard, but it's not "install and go" like Copilot.
Cost
$20/month for Claude Pro (required). If you're on a tight budget and just want basic completions, GitHub Copilot ($10/month) is cheaper.
But if you're doing complex work, Claude Code's capabilities justify the price.
Occasional Overconfidence
Sometimes Claude Code will make changes it's very confident about that are subtly wrong. It doesn't always know what it doesn't know.
Solution: Review diffs before accepting. Use git liberally.
Real-World Performance
Speed
- Simple questions: 5-10 seconds
- Multi-file edits: 30-60 seconds
- Complex refactors: 2-5 minutes
Faster than you'd do it manually. Slower than inline autocomplete.
Accuracy
In my testing:
- ~90% of simple tasks: Perfect
- ~75% of complex tasks: Correct with minor adjustments
- ~50% of edge cases: Needs human guidance
Better than any other AI tool I've used, but not infallible.
Context Retention
Claude Code maintains context within a session. It remembers what you discussed, what files you edited, what patterns you prefer.
Across sessions, you need to re-establish context (though it reads your codebase fresh each time).
Claude Code vs Alternatives
vs Cursor
| Factor |
Claude Code |
Cursor |
| Interface |
Terminal |
IDE |
| Best for |
Complex tasks |
Daily coding |
| Context |
Full codebase |
Manual tagging |
| Reasoning |
Deeper |
Good |
| Price |
$20/month |
$20/month |
Verdict: Use Cursor for daily development, Claude Code for hard problems. Many developers use both.
vs GitHub Copilot
| Factor |
Claude Code |
Copilot |
| Interface |
Terminal |
IDE inline |
| Best for |
Features/refactors |
Completions |
| Autonomy |
High |
Low |
| Reasoning |
Deep |
Surface |
| Price |
$20/month |
$10/month |
Verdict: Copilot is a fancy autocomplete. Claude Code is a junior developer. Different tools for different needs.
vs ChatGPT + Copy-Paste
| Factor |
Claude Code |
ChatGPT |
| Codebase awareness |
Full |
None |
| File editing |
Direct |
Manual |
| Context limit |
200K |
128K |
| Workflow |
Integrated |
Copy-paste |
Verdict: If you're still copy-pasting from ChatGPT, you're wasting hours. Claude Code eliminates the friction entirely.
Who Should Use Claude Code
You'll Love It If:
- You work on complex projects with many interconnected files
- You're comfortable in the terminal (or willing to learn)
- You value reasoning over raw speed
- You do frequent refactoring or codebase migrations
- You want an AI that explains itself before making changes
Skip It If:
- You mainly need autocomplete for writing new code
- You hate the terminal and can't imagine leaving your IDE
- Your projects are small and straightforward
- Budget is tight and $20/month is a stretch
- You want plug-and-play without learning new workflows
Getting Started with Claude Code
Installation
# Using npm
npm install -g @anthropic-ai/claude-code
# Using Homebrew
brew install claude-code
Requires Node.js 18+ and a Claude Pro subscription.
First Run
cd your-project
claude
It'll analyze your codebase and you can start chatting.
Essential Commands
/help - Show available commands/clear - Clear conversation/compact - Summarize and continue/cost - Show token usage
Tips for Best Results
- Be specific: "Add error handling to the user service" > "make it better"
- Provide context: "We use PostgreSQL and TypeORM" helps it make correct decisions
- Review diffs: Always check changes before accepting
- Use git: Commit before big operations so you can revert
- Iterate: Start broad, then refine
The Bottom Line
Claude Code is the best AI coding tool for complex work. Period.
It's not the most accessible. It's not the cheapest. It's not the prettiest.
But when you're staring at a gnarly refactor, a mysterious bug, or a codebase you don't understand—Claude Code is what you want.
The hype is real. It's just not for everyone.
My recommendation:
- If you do serious development work, try it for a month. You'll know within a week if it fits your workflow.
- If you just want faster typing, stick with Copilot.
- If you want both power and convenience, pair Claude Code with Cursor.
Need help building AI-powered development workflows? Cedar Operations helps teams integrate AI tools into their processes for maximum productivity. Book a consultation →
Related reading:
CEDAR OPERATIONS